Page 23 - Viveka Satakam - Eng

xxi
About the Author

māyāvādī who was inimical towards Lord Viṣṇu and the
Vaiṣṇavas is an abominable Vaiṣṇava offense which will
lead one to hell.

In the Caitanya-caritāmṛta (Madhya, chapter 25 and Ādi,
7.62 onwards) we find narrations about the māyāvādī
Prakāśānanda. How a person who was a māyāvādī
between the Śaka year of 1425 and 1430 (1503-1508
AD) could have gone to the South and become a Śrī
Vaiṣṇava in 1433 (1511 AD), and then again become a
māyāvādī in Kāśī in 1435 (1513 AD) cannot be understood.
Therefore, the attempt to establish that Prakāśānanda
and Prabodhānanda are the same person is a sign of
utter ignorance. Consequently, this tendency to ruin
historical facts in such a way causes great sadness. Being
subjected to his own humbleness and meekness, Śrīla
Prabodhānanda Sarasvatī had Śrīla Gopāla Bhaṭṭa forbid
any narrations about him to be recorded in the Caitanya-
caritāmṛta, and Śrīla Kavirāja Gosvāmī did not violate
his order. Thus, we find the present difficulties. If Śrīla
Prabodhānanda knew that in the future there would be a
misleading attempt to include him amongst the class of
offenders towards Lord Viṣṇu and the Vaiṣṇavas, then he
would not have made such a prohibition. The readers of
the Bhakti-ratnākara can understand this. In connection
with Śrīla Prabodhānanda, in the Bhakti-ratnākara (1.83-
84,128-129,133,135,149-150) it is written:

tirumalaya, vyeṅkaṭa, āra prabodhānanda
tina bhrātāra prāṇa-dhana gauracandra