Page 18 - Lekha-mala (English)
P. 18
8 Lekha-mālā
(even about the impossibility) of being diksa parampara and
similar statements, also about philosophy (the dormant prema
etc.) and contradictions in Srila Prabhupada’s books as well as
about verses which Srila Prabhupada translates and comments
on with no connection to the actual verse in Sanskrit/Bengali.
If you are familiar with this, I would humbly like to ask you
for an explanation of this or to guide me to someone who can
explain those conclusions. (I do not wish to repeat what he is
saying.)
As you have not very clearly stated what rascal things you
have heard, I cannot clearly reply to them. But please kindly
consider: do you really think S is a better scholar and devotee
than Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati and Srila Prabhupada?
Is he more favored by Krsna to understand and explain the
purports of sastra than these great acaryas?
If S is correct then Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati and Srila
Prabhupada were in maya and all their preaching was simply
misleading. Can you accept this?
For your information S gave up his heritage to become the paid
servant of beef eaters and drunkards in America, where by the
mercy of Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati and Srila Prabhupada
he came in contact with Krishna consciousness through
ISKCON. He subsequently spent many years taking shelter in
Srila Prabhupada’s ashrams learning Sanskrit and is now using
the little learning he acquired to teach that Srila Prabhupada
did not know what he was talking about. I cannot imagine
what will be the destination of such a person.
For your further information, there are many scholars in India
far more knowledgeable than S who accept ISKCON as bona fide.